Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3450 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3450 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 3902 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3450.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i9-13900 - $69.0 vs $567.98
- Up to 86% better value when playing Apex Legends than Core i9-13900 - $0.27 vs $1.88 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 16% better in Apex Legends than Core i5-3450 - 302 vs 260 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i5-3450 - 65 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3450 - 32 vs 4 threads
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
260
86.09271523178808%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$69
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349411 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
302
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.88/FPS
14.361702127659576%
Price, $
$567.98
12%
FPS Winner
Buy for $567.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349412 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
603
22.21812822402358%
Multi-Core
1781
10.84256666260806%
Intel Core i5-3450 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |