Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3450S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3450S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 2700 is 2181 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3450S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450S
- Up to 49% cheaper than Ryzen 7 2700 - $95.0 vs $185.0
- Up to 18% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Ryzen 7 2700 - $3.52 vs $4.3 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Performs up to 59% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i5-3450S - 43 vs 27 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3450S - 16 vs 4 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
27
62.7906976744186%
Value, $/FPS
$3.52/FPS
100%
Price, $
$95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349158 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
43
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.3/FPS
81.86046511627907%
Price, $
$185
51%
FPS Winner
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349159 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
584
52.42369838420108%
Multi-Core
1681
30.62488613590818%
Intel Core i5-3450S | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |