Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3450S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3450S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 2923 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3450S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450S
- Up to 58% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $95.0 vs $225.99
- Up to 51% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Core i7-10700F - $0.76 vs $1.55 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 17% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Core i5-3450S - 146 vs 125 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3450S - 16 vs 4 threads
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
125
85.61643835616438%
Value, $/FPS
$0.76/FPS
100%
Price, $
$95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349159 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
146
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.55/FPS
49.03225806451613%
Price, $
$225.99
42%
FPS Winner
Buy for $225.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349160 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
584
36.22828784119106%
Multi-Core
1681
23.24713041073157%
Intel Core i5-3450S | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |