Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 1700 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3450S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3450S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 1700 is 1768 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3450S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450S
- Up to 51% cheaper than Ryzen 7 1700 - $95.0 vs $195.0
- Up to 49% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 7 1700 - $0.56 vs $1.1 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 1700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1700
- Performs up to 5% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-3450S - 178 vs 170 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3450S - 16 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
170
95.50561797752809%
Value, $/FPS
$0.56/FPS
100%
Price, $
$95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349158 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
FPS
178
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.1/FPS
50.909090909090914%
Price, $
$195
48%
FPS Winner
Buy for $195 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349159 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
584
58.10945273631841%
Multi-Core
1681
32.96078431372549%
Intel Core i5-3450S | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 1700 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 2nd, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |