Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3450S outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-3450S is 127 days older than the cheaper Core i3-3240.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450S
- Performs up to 1% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i3-3240 - 120 vs 119 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i5-3450S - $41.0 vs $95.0
- Up to 57% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i5-3450S - $0.34 vs $0.79 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i5-3450S - 55 vs 65 Watts
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
120
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.79/FPS
43.037974683544306%
Price, $
$95
43%
FPS Winner
Buy for $95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350103 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
119
99.16666666666667%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350103 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
554
94.86301369863014%
Multi-Core
1137
67.63831052944676%
Intel Core i5-3450S | vs | Intel Core i3-3240 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |