Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3450S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3450S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 3902 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3450S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450S
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i9-13900 - $95.0 vs $567.98
- Up to 80% better value when playing Baldur's Gate 3 than Core i9-13900 - $0.86 vs $4.37 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 18% better in Baldur's Gate 3 than Core i5-3450S - 130 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3450S - 32 vs 4 threads
Baldur's Gate 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
110
84.61538461538461%
Value, $/FPS
$0.86/FPS
100%
Price, $
$95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349275 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
130
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.37/FPS
19.679633867276888%
Price, $
$567.98
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for $567.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349276 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
584
21.518054532056006%
Multi-Core
1681
10.233775721417265%
Intel Core i5-3450S | vs | Intel Core i9-13900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |