Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3570 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3570 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 2890 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3570.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3570
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $69.0 vs $225.99
- Up to 66% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i7-10700F - $0.61 vs $1.82 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 10% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-3570 - 124 vs 113 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i5-3570 - 65 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3570 - 16 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
113
91.12903225806451%
Value, $/FPS
$0.61/FPS
100%
Price, $
$69
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348971 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
124
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.82/FPS
33.51648351648351%
Price, $
$225.99
30%
FPS Winner
Buy for $225.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348972 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Single-Core
656
40.69478908188586%
Multi-Core
1924
26.60766145761306%
Intel Core i5-3570 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |