Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3570 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3570 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2890 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3570.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3570
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $69.0 vs $244.77
- Up to 70% better value when playing Valheim than Core i9-10900F - $0.36 vs $1.19 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 7% better in Valheim than Core i5-3570 - 205 vs 191 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i5-3570 - 65 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3570 - 20 vs 4 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
191
93.17073170731707%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
100%
Price, $
$69
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348840 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
205
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.19/FPS
30.252100840336134%
Price, $
$244.77
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for $244.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348841 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Single-Core
656
39.140811455847256%
Multi-Core
1924
22.834084975077143%
Intel Core i5-3570 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |