Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-3570K outperforms the more expensive FX-8350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-3570K is 177 days older than the more expensive FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3570K
- Performs up to 1% better in Valheim than FX-8350 - 192 vs 190 FPS
- Up to 35% cheaper than FX-8350 - $120.23 vs $185.0
- Up to 35% better value when playing Valheim than FX-8350 - $0.63 vs $0.97 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 77 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3570K - 8 vs 4 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
192
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.63/FPS
100%
Price, $
$120.23
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $120.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349407 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
190
98.95833333333334%
Value, $/FPS
$0.97/FPS
64.94845360824742%
Price, $
$185
64%
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349407 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3570K | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |