Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-4440 outperforms the more expensive FX-8350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-4440 is 313 days newer than the more expensive FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4440
- Performs up to 6% better in No Man's Sky than FX-8350 - 167 vs 157 FPS
- Up to 29% cheaper than FX-8350 - $131.71 vs $185.0
- Up to 33% better value when playing No Man's Sky than FX-8350 - $0.79 vs $1.18 per FPS
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 84 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4440 - 8 vs 4 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
167
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.79/FPS
100%
Price, $
$131.71
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $131.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 359833 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
157
94.01197604790418%
Value, $/FPS
$1.18/FPS
66.94915254237289%
Price, $
$185
71%
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 359831 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4440 | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Haswell | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |