Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4440 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4440 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 2433 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4440.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4440
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - $131.71 vs $490.0
- Up to 70% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-10900K - $1.05 vs $3.55 per FPS
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 84 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 10% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-4440 - 138 vs 125 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4440 - 20 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
125
90.57971014492753%
Value, $/FPS
$1.05/FPS
100%
Price, $
$131.71
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $131.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361546 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
138
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.55/FPS
29.5774647887324%
Price, $
$490
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for $490 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361545 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
1033
59.062321326472265%
Multi-Core
2902
31.670850158245116%
Intel Core i5-4440 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |