Buy on Amazon
$42.89
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-4590S outperforms the more expensive Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-4590S is 605 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4590S
- Performs up to 18% better in Starfield than Core i3-3220 - 53 vs 45 FPS
- Up to 46% cheaper than Core i3-3220 - $42.89 vs $79.0
- Up to 54% better value when playing Starfield than Core i3-3220 - $0.81 vs $1.76 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i5-4590S - 55 vs 65 Watts
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-4590S
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
53
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.81/FPS
100%
Price, $
$42.89
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core I5-4590S I5 4590S 3.0 GHz Used Quad-Core CPU Processor 6M 65W LGA 1150
Buy for $42.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349818 minutes ago
Core i3-3220
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
45
84.90566037735849%
Value, $/FPS
$1.76/FPS
46.02272727272727%
Price, $
$79
54%
Intel Core i3-3220 Processor (3M Cache, 3.30 GHz) BX80637i33220
Buy for $79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349817 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-4590S
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Core i3-3220
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4590S | vs | Intel Core i3-3220 |
|---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 29.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
