Key Differences
In short — Core i3-3220 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-3220 is 1093 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 49% cheaper than Core i3-3220 - $39.95 vs $79.0
- Up to 48% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i3-3220 - $0.34 vs $0.66 per FPS
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Core i3-3220 - 51 vs 55 Watts
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
119
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.66/FPS
51.515151515151516%
Price, $
$79
50%
Buy for $79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349632 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
119
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349632 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3220 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |