Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-4150 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-4150 is 605 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Performs up to 6% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i3-3220 - 126 vs 119 FPS
- Up to 39% cheaper than Core i3-3220 - $48.0 vs $79.0
- Up to 42% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i3-3220 - $0.38 vs $0.66 per FPS
- Consumes up to 2% less energy than Intel Core i3-3220 - 54 vs 55 Watts
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
119
94.44444444444444%
Value, $/FPS
$0.66/FPS
57.57575757575757%
Price, $
$79
60%
Buy for $79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349763 minutes ago
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
126
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349765 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
525
50.43227665706051%
Multi-Core
1085
53.004396678065454%
Intel Core i3-3220 | vs | Intel Core i3-4150 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 54 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |