Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-4670S outperforms the more expensive FX-6350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-4670S is 34 days newer than the more expensive FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670S
- Performs up to 5% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than FX-6350 - 163 vs 155 FPS
- Up to 45% cheaper than FX-6350 - $55.26 vs $100.0
- Up to 48% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than FX-6350 - $0.34 vs $0.65 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670S - 6 vs 4 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
163
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$55.26
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $55.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349274 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
155
95.0920245398773%
Value, $/FPS
$0.65/FPS
52.307692307692314%
Price, $
$100
55%
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349273 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4670S | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Haswell | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |