Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-4690 outperforms the more expensive FX-8350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-4690 is 555 days newer than the more expensive FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690
- Performs up to 20% better in Rust than FX-8350 - 186 vs 155 FPS
- Up to 72% cheaper than FX-8350 - $52.0 vs $185.0
- Up to 76% better value when playing Rust than FX-8350 - $0.28 vs $1.19 per FPS
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 84 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4690 - 8 vs 4 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
186
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.28/FPS
100%
Price, $
$52
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349404 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
155
83.33333333333334%
Value, $/FPS
$1.19/FPS
23.529411764705884%
Price, $
$185
28%
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349403 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4690 | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Haswell | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |