Buy on Amazon
$52
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-4690 outperforms the more expensive Core i5-3450S on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-4690 is 732 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-3450S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690
- Performs up to 4% better in HITMAN 3 than Core i5-3450S - 197 vs 189 FPS
- Up to 45% cheaper than Core i5-3450S - $52.0 vs $95.0
- Up to 48% better value when playing HITMAN 3 than Core i5-3450S - $0.26 vs $0.5 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450S
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i5-4690 - 65 vs 84 Watts
HITMAN 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-4690
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
197
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
100%
Price, $
$52
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i5-4690 Processor (6M Cache, 3.5 GHz upto 3.90 GHz) BX80646I54690, CPU Only
Buy for $52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350035 minutes ago
Intel Core i5-3450S Quad-Core Processor 2.8 GHz 6 MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80637I53450S
Buy for $95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350034 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-4690
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Core i5-3450S
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-3450S
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
584
49.03442485306465%
Multi-Core
1681
50.89312745988496%
Intel Core i5-4690 | vs | Intel Core i5-3450S |
|---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 84 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
