Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4690K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4690K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 2479 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4690K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690K
- Up to 53% cheaper than Core i5-11400F - $53.5 vs $113.0
- Up to 50% better value when playing Valheim than Core i5-11400F - $0.27 vs $0.54 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 6% better in Valheim than Core i5-4690K - 210 vs 199 FPS
- Consumes up to 26% less energy than Intel Core i5-4690K - 65 vs 88 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4690K - 12 vs 4 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
FPS
199
94.76190476190476%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$53.5
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $53.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349163 minutes ago
Buy for $113 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349163 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Single-Core
1287
65.62978072412035%
Multi-Core
3631
47.7260778128286%
Intel Core i5-4690K | vs | Intel Core i5-11400F |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
88 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |