Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-4690 outperforms the more expensive Core i5-6400 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-4690 is 427 days older than the more expensive Core i5-6400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6400
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i5-4690 - 65 vs 84 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690
- Performs up to 1% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i5-6400 - 128 vs 127 FPS
- Up to 48% cheaper than Core i5-6400 - $52.0 vs $99.95
- Up to 48% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i5-6400 - $0.41 vs $0.79 per FPS
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
127
99.21875%
Value, $/FPS
$0.79/FPS
51.89873417721519%
Price, $
$99.95
52%
Buy for $99.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349631 minutes ago
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
128
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
100%
Price, $
$52
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349631 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Single-Core
1111
93.28295549958018%
Multi-Core
3023
91.52285800787163%
Intel Core i5-6400 | vs | Intel Core i5-4690 |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |