Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-4690 outperforms the more expensive FX-6350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-4690 is 367 days newer than the more expensive FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690
- Performs up to 8% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than FX-6350 - 128 vs 118 FPS
- Up to 48% cheaper than FX-6350 - $52.0 vs $100.0
- Up to 52% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than FX-6350 - $0.41 vs $0.85 per FPS
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 84 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4690 - 6 vs 4 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
128
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
100%
Price, $
$52
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349623 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
118
92.1875%
Value, $/FPS
$0.85/FPS
48.23529411764706%
Price, $
$100
52%
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349622 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4690 | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Haswell | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |