Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-4690 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-4690 is 1893 days older than the more expensive Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690
- Performs up to 2% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 3 3200G - 183 vs 180 FPS
- Up to 35% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3200G - $52.0 vs $80.0
- Up to 36% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 3 3200G - $0.28 vs $0.44 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i5-4690 - 65 vs 84 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
183
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.28/FPS
100%
Price, $
$52
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349765 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
180
98.36065573770492%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
63.63636363636365%
Price, $
$80
65%
Buy for $80 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349765 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1052
88.32913518052057%
Multi-Core
3013
91.22010293672419%
Intel Core i5-4690 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Haswell | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |