Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7400 outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-7400 is 1533 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400
- Performs up to 8% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than FX-4300 - 128 vs 118 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-4300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i5-7400 - $48.02 vs $110.0
- Up to 52% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i5-7400 - $0.41 vs $0.86 per FPS
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
128
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.86/FPS
47.67441860465116%
Price, $
$110
43%
FPS Winner
Buy for $110 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349513 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
118
92.1875%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $48.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349512 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7400 | vs | AMD FX-4300 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |