Buy on Amazon
$110
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $42
Availability
MSRP in USD: $42
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7400 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-7400 is 455 days older than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400
- Performs up to 6% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron G4900 - 182 vs 171 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 55% cheaper than Core i5-7400 - $50.0 vs $110.0
- Up to 52% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-7400 - $0.29 vs $0.6 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i5-7400 - 54 vs 65 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Core i5-7400
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
182
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.6/FPS
48.333333333333336%
Price, $
$110
45%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i5 i5-7400 Quad-core (4 Core) 3 GHz Processor - Socket H4 LGA-1151OEM Pack (D132)
Buy for $110 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349514 minutes ago
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
171
93.95604395604396%
Value, $/FPS
$0.29/FPS
100%
Price, $
$50
100%
Value Winner
Intel® Celeron® G4900 Desktop Processor 2 Core 3.1GHz LGA1151 300 Series 54W BX80684G4900
Buy for $50 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349513 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Core i5-7400
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
52.38095238095239%
Multi-Core
1051
32.51856435643564%
Intel Core i5-7400 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 30.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
