Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7400 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-7400 is 1583 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400
- Performs up to 8% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i3-3240 - 128 vs 119 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i5-7400 - $41.0 vs $110.0
- Up to 60% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i5-7400 - $0.34 vs $0.86 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i5-7400 - 55 vs 65 Watts
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
128
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.86/FPS
39.53488372093024%
Price, $
$110
37%
FPS Winner
Buy for $110 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349635 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
119
92.96875%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349634 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
554
47.10884353741497%
Multi-Core
1137
35.179455445544555%
Intel Core i5-7400 | vs | Intel Core i3-3240 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |