Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 1213 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - $110.0 vs $490.0
- Up to 76% better value when playing Valheim than Core i9-10900K - $0.56 vs $2.38 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 4% better in Valheim than Core i5-7400 - 206 vs 198 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400 - 20 vs 4 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
198
96.11650485436894%
Value, $/FPS
$0.56/FPS
100%
Price, $
$110
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $110 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349046 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
206
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.38/FPS
23.529411764705884%
Price, $
$490
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for $490 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349045 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1176
67.23842195540308%
Multi-Core
3232
35.27229073447561%
Intel Core i5-7400 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |