Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7400T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7400T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 2192 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7400T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Up to 89% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $63.5 vs $591.89
- Up to 73% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $1.59 vs $5.92 per FPS
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 35 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 150% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i5-7400T - 100 vs 40 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400T - 32 vs 4 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $63.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349268 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
100
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.92/FPS
26.85810810810811%
Price, $
$591.89
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for $591.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349267 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1017
34.85263879369431%
Multi-Core
2806
14.292263026536952%
Intel Core i5-7400T | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |