Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-760 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-760 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-13100 is 4553 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-760.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-760
- Up to 32% cheaper than Core i3-13100 - $100.0 vs $147.99
- Up to 13% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-13100 - $0.87 vs $1.0 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100
- Performs up to 29% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-760 - 148 vs 115 FPS
- Consumes up to 37% less energy than Intel Core i5-760 - 60 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-760 - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-760 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
FPS
115
77.7027027027027%
Value, $/FPS
$0.87/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 358253 minutes ago
Buy for $147.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 358253 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Single-Core
457
20.284065690190857%
Multi-Core
1280
17.445822543273817%
Intel Core i5-760 | vs | Intel Core i3-13100 |
---|---|---|
Jul 18th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 60 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |