Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-2700K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-2700K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 3111 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-2700K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 6% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i7-2700K - 295 vs 278 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-2700K - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2700K - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2700K
- Up to 27% cheaper than Core i5-10400F - $82.0 vs $112.53
- Up to 24% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i5-10400F - $0.29 vs $0.38 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
295
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
76.3157894736842%
Price, $
$112.53
72%
FPS Winner
Buy for $112.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349407 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
FPS
278
94.23728813559322%
Value, $/FPS
$0.29/FPS
100%
Price, $
$82
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349406 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
Single-Core
664
46.17524339360223%
Multi-Core
2264
39.36706659711355%
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | Intel Core i7-2700K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 24th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |