Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 2558 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 8% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than FX-6350 - 295 vs 274 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 12 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 11% cheaper than Core i5-10400F - $100.0 vs $112.53
- Up to 5% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i5-10400F - $0.36 vs $0.38 per FPS
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
295
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
94.73684210526315%
Price, $
$112.53
88%
FPS Winner
Buy for $112.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349516 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
274
92.88135593220339%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349515 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Comet Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |