Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-760 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 3894 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-760.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-760
- Up to 38% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - $100.0 vs $160.68
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 62% better in Far Cry 6 than Core i5-760 - 147 vs 91 FPS
- Up to 1% better value when playing Far Cry 6 than Core i5-760 - $1.09 vs $1.1 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-760 - 12 vs 4 threads
Far Cry 6
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
FPS
91
61.904761904761905%
Value, $/FPS
$1.1/FPS
99.09090909090908%
Price, $
$100
100%
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 359823 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
147
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.09/FPS
100%
Price, $
$160.68
62%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $160.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 359824 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Single-Core
457
20.81056466302368%
Multi-Core
1280
14.700815435856207%
Intel Core i5-760 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
---|---|---|
Jul 18th, 2010 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |