Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-3450 outperforms the more expensive Core i5-760 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-3450 is 651 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-760.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450
- Performs up to 2% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-760 - 117 vs 115 FPS
- Up to 31% cheaper than Core i5-760 - $69.0 vs $100.0
- Up to 32% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-760 - $0.59 vs $0.87 per FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Core i5-760 - 77 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-760 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
FPS
115
98.29059829059828%
Value, $/FPS
$0.87/FPS
67.81609195402298%
Price, $
$100
69%
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 358264 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
117
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.59/FPS
100%
Price, $
$69
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 358264 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-760 | vs | Intel Core i5-3450 |
---|---|---|
Jul 18th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 77 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |