Buy on Amazon
$100
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3820 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-760 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-760 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-3820 is 575 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-760.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-760
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i7-3820 - $100.0 vs $319.88
- Up to 67% better value when playing Cyberpunk 2077 than Core i7-3820 - $1.69 vs $5.16 per FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Core i7-3820 - 95 vs 130 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3820
- Performs up to 5% better in Cyberpunk 2077 than Core i5-760 - 62 vs 59 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-760 - 8 vs 4 threads
Cyberpunk 2077
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Core i5-760
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
FPS
59
95.16129032258065%
Value, $/FPS
$1.69/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i5-760 Processor 2.8 GHz 8 MB Cache Socket LGA1156
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361515 minutes ago
Core i7-3820
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
FPS
62
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.16/FPS
32.751937984496124%
Price, $
$319.88
31%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i7-3820 Quad-Core Processor 3.6 GHz 10 MB Cache LGA 2011 - BX80619I73820
Buy for $319.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361515 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Core i5-760
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Core i7-3820
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-760
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Single-Core
457
74.06807131280388%
Multi-Core
1280
55.676381035232716%
Intel Core i5-760 | vs | Intel Core i7-3820 |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 18th, 2010 | Release Date | Feb 13th, 2012 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Lynnfield | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
| Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 130 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 21.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
