Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-760 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-760 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 4127 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-760.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-760
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i9-12900K - $100.0 vs $376.99
- Up to 69% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i9-12900K - $0.6 vs $1.95 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 16% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i5-760 - 193 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-760 - 24 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-760 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
FPS
167
86.52849740932642%
Value, $/FPS
$0.6/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361319 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
193
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.95/FPS
30.76923076923077%
Price, $
$376.99
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for $376.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361319 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Single-Core
457
17.442748091603054%
Multi-Core
1280
8.287471673680804%
Intel Core i5-760 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900K |
---|---|---|
Jul 18th, 2010 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |