Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-760 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-760 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 3894 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-760.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-760
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i9-11900K - $100.0 vs $265.0
- Up to 47% better value when playing Minecraft than Core i9-11900K - $0.17 vs $0.32 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 38% better in Minecraft than Core i5-760 - 825 vs 599 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-760 - 16 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-760 doesn't have integrated graphics
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
FPS
599
72.60606060606061%
Value, $/FPS
$0.17/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361045 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
825
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
53.125%
Price, $
$265
37%
FPS Winner
Buy for $265 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361045 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Single-Core
457
19.27456769295656%
Multi-Core
1280
11.691633175009134%
Intel Core i5-760 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900K |
---|---|---|
Jul 18th, 2010 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |