Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-760 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-760 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900 is 4188 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-760.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-760
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i9-12900 - $100.0 vs $458.0
- Up to 53% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i9-12900 - $0.42 vs $0.89 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900
- Performs up to 118% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i5-760 - 514 vs 236 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-760 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-760 - 24 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-760 doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
FPS
236
45.91439688715953%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361456 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
514
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.89/FPS
47.19101123595505%
Price, $
$458
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for $458 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361456 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-760 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900 |
---|---|---|
Jul 18th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |