Buy on Amazon
$100
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7940X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-760 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-760 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-7940X is 2602 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-760.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-760
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i9-7940X - $100.0 vs $425.0
- Up to 73% better value when playing Valorant than Core i9-7940X - $0.15 vs $0.55 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i9-7940X - 95 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7940X
- Performs up to 13% better in Valorant than Core i5-760 - 772 vs 684 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-760 - 28 vs 4 threads
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i5-760
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
FPS
684
88.60103626943005%
Value, $/FPS
$0.15/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i5-760 Processor 2.8 GHz 8 MB Cache Socket LGA1156
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361464 minutes ago
Core i9-7940X
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
FPS
772
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.55/FPS
27.27272727272727%
Price, $
$425
23%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i9-7940X X-Series Processor 14 Cores up to 4.3 GHz Turbo Unlocked LGA2066 X299 Series 165W
Buy for $425 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361465 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i5-760
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Core i9-7940X
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-760
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Single-Core
457
33.35766423357664%
Multi-Core
1280
12.899324800967449%
Intel Core i5-760 | vs | Intel Core i9-7940X |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 18th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2017 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Lynnfield | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 14 |
| 4 | Threads | 28 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 165 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 21.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
