Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7600 outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-7600 is 1533 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7600
- Performs up to 6% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than FX-4300 - 158 vs 149 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-4300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 51% cheaper than Core i5-7600 - $48.02 vs $99.0
- Up to 49% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-7600 - $0.32 vs $0.63 per FPS
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
158
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.63/FPS
50.79365079365079%
Price, $
$99
48%
FPS Winner
Buy for $99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350102 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
149
94.30379746835443%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $48.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350101 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7600 | vs | AMD FX-4300 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |