Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7600 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-7600 is 1220 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7600
- Performs up to 3% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i3-4130 - 204 vs 198 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i5-7600 - $43.0 vs $99.0
- Up to 55% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i5-7600 - $0.22 vs $0.49 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i5-7600 - 54 vs 65 Watts
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
204
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
44.89795918367347%
Price, $
$99
43%
FPS Winner
Buy for $99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350095 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
198
97.05882352941177%
Value, $/FPS
$0.22/FPS
100%
Price, $
$43
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350095 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
995
72.46904588492352%
Multi-Core
1960
51.41657922350472%
Intel Core i5-7600 | vs | Intel Core i3-4130 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |