Buy on Amazon
$99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7600 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-7600 is 490 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7600
- Performs up to 10% better in Borderlands 3 than Celeron G3900 - 217 vs 198 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i5-7600 - $39.95 vs $99.0
- Up to 57% better value when playing Borderlands 3 than Core i5-7600 - $0.2 vs $0.46 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-7600 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Core i5-7600
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
217
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.46/FPS
43.47826086956522%
Price, $
$99
40%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i5 i5-7600 Quad-Core (4 Core) 3.50 GHz Processor - Socket H4 LGA-1151 OEM Pack-Tray Packaging CM8067702868011
Buy for $99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350247 minutes ago
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
198
91.24423963133641%
Value, $/FPS
$0.2/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.95
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G3900 2.8GHz Dual-Core Processor SR2HV LGA 1151 (CM8066201928610)
Buy for $39.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350245 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Core i5-7600
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
42.316096139839765%
Multi-Core
992
26.02308499475341%
Intel Core i5-7600 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
