Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-4130 outperforms the more expensive FX-6350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-4130 is 125 days newer than the more expensive FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Performs up to 5% better in Elden Ring than FX-6350 - 117 vs 111 FPS
- Up to 57% cheaper than FX-6350 - $43.0 vs $100.0
- Up to 59% better value when playing Elden Ring than FX-6350 - $0.37 vs $0.9 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 54 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130 - 6 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
117
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.37/FPS
100%
Price, $
$43
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349272 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
111
94.87179487179486%
Value, $/FPS
$0.9/FPS
41.11111111111111%
Price, $
$100
43%
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349271 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4130 | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Haswell | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |