Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 2192 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7600K
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i9-13900 - $210.0 vs $567.98
- Up to 59% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i9-13900 - $0.78 vs $1.9 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 11% better in Ready or Not than Core i5-7600K - 299 vs 269 FPS
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i5-7600K - 65 vs 91 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7600K - 32 vs 4 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
269
89.96655518394648%
Value, $/FPS
$0.78/FPS
100%
Price, $
$210
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $210 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361147 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
299
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.9/FPS
41.05263157894738%
Price, $
$567.98
36%
FPS Winner
Buy for $567.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361146 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1507
55.52689756816507%
Multi-Core
4226
25.727505174723%
Intel Core i5-7600K | vs | Intel Core i9-13900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
91 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |