Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8400 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-540 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-540 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-8400 is 2828 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-540.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400
- Performs up to 7% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i3-540 - 158 vs 148 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i3-540 - 65 vs 73 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-540 - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-540
- Up to 36% cheaper than Core i5-8400 - $90.0 vs $140.0
- Up to 31% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-8400 - $0.61 vs $0.89 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8400 doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
158
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.89/FPS
68.53932584269663%
Price, $
$140
64%
FPS Winner
Buy for $140 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349948 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
FPS
148
93.67088607594937%
Value, $/FPS
$0.61/FPS
100%
Price, $
$90
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $90 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349947 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Single-Core
408
30.155210643015522%
Multi-Core
841
17.712721145745576%
Intel Core i5-8400 | vs | Intel Core i3-540 |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Clarkdale |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 73 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |