Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8400 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6800K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6800K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-8400 is 492 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6800K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400
- Performs up to 4% better in Starfield than Core i7-6800K - 57 vs 55 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-6800K - 65 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6800K
- Up to 23% cheaper than Core i5-8400 - $108.0 vs $140.0
- Up to 20% better value when playing Starfield than Core i5-8400 - $1.96 vs $2.46 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8400 - 12 vs 6 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
57
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.46/FPS
79.67479674796748%
Price, $
$140
77%
FPS Winner
Buy for $140 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349593 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
55
96.49122807017544%
Value, $/FPS
$1.96/FPS
100%
Price, $
$108
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $108 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349593 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-8400 | vs | Intel Core i7-6800K |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |