Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8400 outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-8400 is 472 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400
- Performs up to 1% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 293 vs 289 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Up to 33% cheaper than Core i5-8400 - $94.05 vs $140.0
- Up to 31% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i5-8400 - $0.33 vs $0.48 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8400 - 12 vs 6 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
293
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.48/FPS
68.75000000000001%
Price, $
$140
67%
FPS Winner
Buy for $140 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349583 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
289
98.63481228668942%
Value, $/FPS
$0.33/FPS
100%
Price, $
$94.05
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $94.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349584 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-8400 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |