Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8400T outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-8400T is 1432 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4150.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400T
- Performs up to 3% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i3-4150 - 322 vs 314 FPS
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Core i3-4150 - 35 vs 54 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i5-8400T - $48.0 vs $139.0
- Up to 65% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i5-8400T - $0.15 vs $0.43 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8400T doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
322
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
34.883720930232556%
Price, $
$139
34%
FPS Winner
Buy for $139 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361319 minutes ago
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
314
97.51552795031056%
Value, $/FPS
$0.15/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361319 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
1041
94.72247497725205%
Multi-Core
2047
52.70339855818743%
Intel Core i5-8400T | vs | Intel Core i3-4150 |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |