Buy on Amazon
$139
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8400T outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2400S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2400S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-8400T is 2640 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2400S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400T
- Performs up to 79% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i5-2400S - 43 vs 24 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-2400S - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400S - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400S
- Up to 50% cheaper than Core i5-8400T - $70.0 vs $139.0
- Up to 10% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i5-8400T - $2.92 vs $3.23 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8400T doesn't have integrated graphics
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-8400T
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
43
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.23/FPS
90.40247678018576%
Price, $
$139
50%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i5-8400T prcsr Tray
Buy for $139 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361065 minutes ago
Core i5-2400S
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
24
55.81395348837209%
Value, $/FPS
$2.92/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i5-2400S Quad-Core Processor 2.5 GHz 6 MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80623I52400S
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361063 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-8400T
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Core i5-2400S
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-2400S
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
496
45.1319381255687%
Multi-Core
1352
34.809474768280126%
Intel Core i5-8400T | vs | Intel Core i5-2400S |
|---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
| 1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 17.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
