Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8400T outperforms the cheaper Core i7-860 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-860 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-8400T is 3128 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-860.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400T
- Performs up to 20% better in Cyberpunk 2077 than Core i7-860 - 71 vs 59 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i7-860 - 35 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-860
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i5-8400T - $48.0 vs $139.0
- Up to 59% better value when playing Cyberpunk 2077 than Core i5-8400T - $0.81 vs $1.96 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8400T - 8 vs 6 threads
Cyberpunk 2077
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
71
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.96/FPS
41.3265306122449%
Price, $
$139
34%
FPS Winner
Buy for $139 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361356 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
FPS
59
83.09859154929578%
Value, $/FPS
$0.81/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361355 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-8400T | vs | Intel Core i7-860 |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |