Buy on Amazon
$139
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8400T outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-8400T is 2037 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400T
- Performs up to 8% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-3240 - 126 vs 117 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i3-3240 - 35 vs 55 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i5-8400T - $41.0 vs $139.0
- Up to 68% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-8400T - $0.35 vs $1.1 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8400T doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i5-8400T
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
126
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.1/FPS
31.818181818181813%
Price, $
$139
29%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i5-8400T prcsr Tray
Buy for $139 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361347 minutes ago
Core i3-3240
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
117
92.85714285714286%
Value, $/FPS
$0.35/FPS
100%
Price, $
$41
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i3-3240 3.4GHz 3.40GHz 3M SR0RH Socket 1155 Ivy Bridge CPU Processor
Buy for $41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361346 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i5-8400T
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Core i3-3240
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-3240
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
554
50.40946314831665%
Multi-Core
1137
29.273944387229662%
Intel Core i5-8400T | vs | Intel Core i3-3240 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
| 1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 17.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
