Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 2318 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 15% better in Minecraft than Core i3-3240 - 703 vs 612 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240 - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i5-9400F - $41.0 vs $112.0
- Up to 56% better value when playing Minecraft than Core i5-9400F - $0.07 vs $0.16 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i5-9400F - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
703
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.16/FPS
43.75000000000001%
Price, $
$112
36%
FPS Winner
Buy for $112 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361269 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
612
87.05547652916074%
Value, $/FPS
$0.07/FPS
100%
Price, $
$41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361268 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
554
40.20319303338171%
Multi-Core
1137
23.520893669838642%
Intel Core i5-9400F | vs | Intel Core i3-3240 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |