Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 3000G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 162 days newer than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 7% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Athlon 3000G - 191 vs 178 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $63.83 vs $225.99
- Up to 69% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-10700F - $0.36 vs $1.18 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
191
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.18/FPS
30.508474576271187%
Price, $
$225.99
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for $225.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348795 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
178
93.19371727748691%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
100%
Price, $
$63.83
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $63.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348796 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Single-Core
957
59.36724565756823%
Multi-Core
1975
27.312958097082007%
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Athlon |
Comet Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |